Supporting Blood Cancer Clinical Trial Predicting Study Challenges

Supporting Blood Cancer Clinical Trials: Predicting Study Challenges

Treatment of blood cancer has dramatically improved over the last several decades. Innovators continue to make improvements and advancements through clinical research, with over 18,000 clinical trials spanning numerous hematologic cancers listed on clinicaltrial.gov as of August 2022.

What challenges should Sponsors conducting these trials anticipate, and how does the team at PharPoint Research – a CRO with oncology expertise – tackle these challenges?

 

Blood Cancer 101

Let’s start with the basics: what is blood cancer? The National Cancer Institute defines blood cancer, also called hematologic cancer, as cancer that begins in blood-forming tissue.

There are three primary types of blood cancer – leukemia (cancer of white blood cells), lymphoma (cancer of the lymphatic system), and myeloma (cancer of plasma cells). 

According to Yale Medicine, blood cancers account for about 10 percent of all diagnosed cancers in the United States annually.

 

Addressing Common Obstacles in Blood Cancer Clinical Trials 

Three of the most common obstacles our team sees within blood cancer clinical trials are high logistical complexity, low patient awareness, and the need for increased patient safety monitoring. 

 

High Logistical Complexity

Blood cancer trials are logistically complicated. Any team working on a study must ensure the many moving parts align seamlessly. 

How does PharPoint overcome this? 

When it comes to managing complex trials seamlessly, experience is vital. The PharPoint team has experience in cohort management along with experience managing complicated logistics and is capable of mitigating risk and avoiding delays. 

Low Patient Awareness

The patient population for leukemia/lymphoma is typically highly motivated, despite trial complexities. Despite this motivation, patient awareness is still a significant enrollment challenge.

How does PharPoint overcome this? 

PharPoint’s team has relationships with numerous industry-leading sites across the United States and has experience engaging advocacy groups to increase patient awareness. These combined relationships and resources help to ensure institutions themselves are prioritizing your study and getting your trial in front of suitable patients.

Increased Patient Safety Monitoring

Safety monitoring in oncology frequently requires a much higher level of review and understanding due to the sheer volume of adverse experiences that must be characterized and documented. 

How does PharPoint overcome this? 

Our network of monitors is equipped with a preexisting comprehension of the CTCAE grading associated with toxicity management. They understand the impact of the interpretation of results on overall safety reporting and data analysis. 



RELATED RESOURCES

EBOOK

Standard Clinical Trial Timelines: A Sponsor’s Guide to Evaluating Biometrics CROs

This brief guide provides timeline benchmarks for Sponsors evaluating biometrics contract research organizations (CROs).


Exploring Standard CRO Timeline Benchmarks

Preparing to work with a top biometrics contract research organization and wondering how their promised data management, biostatistics, and medical writing timelines match up to the industry average? To help sponsors dig into these details and ensure the timelines they’re receiving are competitive, we’re providing PharPoint’s typical timelines alongside research that calculates industry standard timelines, when available.

Our hope is that this document can help sponsors set realistic expectations, confidently ask the right questions of their vendors, and ultimately, partner with a top biometrics CRO that keeps their study moving: because patients are waiting.

 

eBook contents include:

PharPoint’s short eBook, Standard Clinical Trial Timelines: A Sponsor’s Guide to Evaluating Biometrics CROs, includes the below information.

  • Standard database build timeline
    • The bigger picture: Considering site identification and study start-up
  • Standard mid-study database change timeline
  • Standard database lock time
    • Six strategies for a faster database lock
  • Evaluating database lock to top line results timeline
    • Ensuring a rapid delivery
  • Evaluating database lock to delivery of tables, listings, and figures (TLF) timeline
  • Standard clinical study report delivery timeline
  • About PharPoint Research

Compare Standard Clinical Trial Timelines

For instant access to the eBook, fill out the form below.


RELATED RESOURCES