Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: A Caregiver, Advocate, and Project Manager’s Perspective

Breast Cancer Clinical Trials A Caregiver & Project Managers Perspective

 “Being an advocate for my mother made a big difference,” Tamara said. “Some people might be going through this process alone, or may not be able to understand the whole disease. I feel I was fortunate to be able to put my oncology background to work advocating for my mom.”

Tamara, a project manager (PM) at PharPoint Research, has significant experience within the breast cancer research community.

Her experience spans over a decade and includes working with the National Cancer Institute and pharmaceutical companies to develop research protocols and operations logistics for large, multi-center Phase 2 and 3 oncology trials including biospecimen management.

When Tamara’s mother was diagnosed with Stage 1 Breast Cancer, she experienced first-hand the challenges of being a caregiver for a breast cancer patient.

“It’s difficult, when you’re in that position,” Tamara shared.

“You are familiar with the potential outcomes, and you know the probabilities. You try to take on the role of caregiver and supporter of your loved one, while at the same time being respectful and trusting of the opinion of investigators and clinical experts.

“I felt that I was equipped to ask the right questions,” Tamara said.

“Being an advocate for my mother made a big difference,” Tamara said. “Some people might be going through this process alone or may not be able to understand the whole disease. I feel I was fortunate to be able to put my oncology background to work advocating for my mom.”

Tamara’s personal experience with her mom impacted her approach to managing oncology clinical trials, with a much better understanding and ability to put herself in the shoes of a patient or a nurse at the site.

She emphasized the significance of patient education and understanding when entering a clinical trial along with keeping patients engaged throughout the duration of the study. This can sometimes be a challenge for patients and investigative sites.

Successfully managing clinical trials requires a mindfulness towards potential obstacles and appropriate risk management planning. PMs have to remain fully informed and proactive. “Identifying potential barriers to enrollment early on, considering a patient-centric approach and implementing strategies for mitigating risks accordingly are fundamental.” Tamara said.

“Over the years, there has been so much research being conducted on breast cancer partnering with a lot of funding and advocacy placed into educating society on breast cancer.” Tamara said. “I believe that there is optimism among the scientific community that better therapeutics, or even a cure, can be found within our lifetime.”

“And most importantly, I think that when you’re treating patients, you shouldn’t be seeing the cancer in them,” Tamara said. “You should see that opportunity to get better.”


RELATED RESOURCES

EBOOK

Standard Clinical Trial Timelines: A Sponsor’s Guide to Evaluating Biometrics CROs

This brief guide provides timeline benchmarks for Sponsors evaluating biometrics contract research organizations (CROs).


Exploring Standard CRO Timeline Benchmarks

Preparing to work with a top biometrics contract research organization and wondering how their promised data management, biostatistics, and medical writing timelines match up to the industry average? To help sponsors dig into these details and ensure the timelines they’re receiving are competitive, we’re providing PharPoint’s typical timelines alongside research that calculates industry standard timelines, when available.

Our hope is that this document can help sponsors set realistic expectations, confidently ask the right questions of their vendors, and ultimately, partner with a top biometrics CRO that keeps their study moving: because patients are waiting.

 

eBook contents include:

PharPoint’s short eBook, Standard Clinical Trial Timelines: A Sponsor’s Guide to Evaluating Biometrics CROs, includes the below information.

  • Standard database build timeline
    • The bigger picture: Considering site identification and study start-up
  • Standard mid-study database change timeline
  • Standard database lock time
    • Six strategies for a faster database lock
  • Evaluating database lock to top line results timeline
    • Ensuring a rapid delivery
  • Evaluating database lock to delivery of tables, listings, and figures (TLF) timeline
  • Standard clinical study report delivery timeline
  • About PharPoint Research

Compare Standard Clinical Trial Timelines

For instant access to the eBook, fill out the form below.


RELATED RESOURCES